Blog Details

Honest and Concurrent Use of Trademark

Trademarks are essential for businesses to establish brand identity and prevent unauthorized use by competitors. However, situations may arise where two entities use similar or identical trademarks in good faith. The concept of Honest and Concurrent Use plays a crucial role in such cases, allowing both parties to claim rights over the trademark under specific legal conditions.

What is Honest and Concurrent Use?

Honest and Concurrent Use refers to a legal principle where two parties can register and use similar or identical trademarks for similar goods or services if they can prove:

• Their use of the trademark has been honest and without fraudulent intentions.

• The trademarks have coexisted in the market for a significant period without causing confusion among consumers.

• There is no deliberate attempt to deceive or pass off goods/services as those of the other party.

Legal Framework in India

Under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, the concept of Honest and Concurrent Use is recognized under Section 12, which allows registration of a trademark even if it resembles an already registered one, provided that the applicant demonstrates honest and long-standing use.

Key Factors Considered by Courts and Trademark Authorities

To establish Honest and Concurrent Use, courts and trademark authorities evaluate the following factors:

1. Duration of Use: The applicant must demonstrate continuous use of the mark over a significant period.

2. Nature of Goods/Services: The similarity of the goods or services offered under both trademarks is assessed.

3. Geographical Scope: Whether the marks are used in different regions or overlapping markets.

4. Good Faith Usage: The applicant must prove there was no malicious intent to exploit the reputation of the existing trademark.

5. Extent of Public Awareness: If consumers recognize and differentiate both brands in the market.

Case Laws on Honest and Concurrent Use in India

• K. Narayanan v. S. Murali (2011): The court ruled that both parties had used their trademarks concurrently and honestly, allowing continued use.

• Goenka Institute of Education & Research v. Anjani Kumar Goenka (2009): The court considered long-standing usage and absence of malice in granting co-existence of trademarks.

Challenges in Claiming Honest and Concurrent Use

1. Risk of Consumer Confusion: Even if both parties act in good faith, similar marks can still create confusion among consumers.

2. Burden of Proof: The applicant must provide strong evidence of honest and independent adoption.

3. Opposition from Prior Users: The registered trademark owner may challenge concurrent use claims, leading to legal disputes.

How to Claim Honest and Concurrent Use?

To establish a strong case, businesses should:

• Maintain records of trademark usage, advertisements, and sales history.

• Avoid using elements that closely mimic a well-known brand.

• Seek legal advice before applying for trademark registration in overlapping categories.

Conclusion

Honest and Concurrent Use serves as a legal safeguard for businesses with similar trademarks operating in good faith. While Indian trademark law acknowledges such claims, proving their validity requires substantial evidence. Businesses should carefully assess their position, maintain transparency, and take proactive steps to avoid conflicts while securing their trademark rights.